Question:briefs filed in a Supreme Court case?
Question Description & Details
Q: briefs filed in a Supreme Court case?
Related Questions and Answers
► What Makes a Case a Criminal Case?
► What happens next in a criminal case?
► Where can I research case law online for free?
► What are the stages of a criminal case?
► Who can access the Supreme Court Library?
► What conclusions can be made about the court case Roe v. Wade ?
► What Happened in the Roe Vs Wade Case?
► briefs filed in a Supreme Court case?
Answers to Common Questions
What do the US Supreme Court justices do with filed briefs after ...?
After a case is argued and the Court's decision rendered, all the case files, including briefs, must be kept on hand for at least 25 days, in case one of the parties petitions for a rehearing. Digital copies of certain court records are sto...
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_do_the_US_Supreme_Court_justices_do_with_filed_briefsWhere can I find briefs filed in a Supreme Court case?
Briefs are available for the current Term by clicking on Merits Briefs . Previous Terms are available from the ABA Preview Web site. The ABA began providing merits briefs online starting with October Term 2003 and added amicus briefs begin...
http://www.supremecourt.gov/faq_documents.aspx#faqdocument5Related QA
Many lawyers are shocked that 0bama snubbed the Supreme Court: Don't you see he sees himself as a dictator?
Q: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1262534/berg_v_obama.htmlby Thomas J. Latino, Esq.The deadline has come and gone. At 5pm Eastern Standard Time, yesterday, December 1st, 2008 the case of Berg v. Obama reached a seminal moment. Yesterday was the deadline for the Obama legal team to file their response to the Berg Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. There was nothing. According to the Supreme Court’s docket for the case nothing was filed overnight. Mr. Obama has done what hasn’t been done before, he has made history twice, Mr. Obama has blatantly ignored a request from the Supreme Court of the United States—our highest and most revered legal institution; Mr. Obama, quiet frankly has thumbed his nose at the highest court in our land.Being an attorney, I know full well that Rule 11 of the United States Supreme Court does not specifically dictate a Respondent file a reply brief “unless specifically ordered by the Court. However, it is out of sheer reverence and respect for the institution, if not to underscore the merits of your case and the lacking of your opponents’ that almost ALL Respondents file some sort of reply with the court. Mr. Obama’s actions yesterday reek of a type of arrogance that even I as an attorney never displayed to any court nor have I have ever witnessed such flippant behavior during my entire legal career.This is not some low level circuit court; this is the United States Supreme Court. Why would the Obama legal team find it necessary to work so diligently in the Federal Court in Pennsylvania filing Motions to Dismiss and Protective Orders and not even file a Waiver of Rights with the Supreme Court? One can surmise two logical possible explanations for Mr. Obama’s strategy: (1) Mr. Obama is putting all his chips on the hopes that 4 justices will view Mr. Berg’s petition as laughable and deny his Petition for the Writ and (2) Refer to #1.now Berg has filed more motionsall 0bama had to do was show that bc and Berg promised to drop thisSay why didn't 0bama print off that thing from factcheck and give it to the Supremes? (LOL)
A: Yes, I do...and I completely agree with the author. He's supposedly about to take an oath to uphold our constitution, yet he's done everything in his power to get around it.
Next QA: What is the "Pauline Privilege"?
Pre QA: What Happened in the Roe Vs Wade Case?